Close Menu
My Betting EdgeMy Betting Edge
    What's Hot

    Blackjack vs. Poker: Which One Has Better Odds and Is Better for Beginners?

    March 5, 2025

    Coral Announces Partnership With Birmingham City FC

    March 3, 2025

    MGM Resorts and BetMGM Expand Responsible Gambling Initiatives

    March 2, 2025
    Trending
    • Blackjack vs. Poker: Which One Has Better Odds and Is Better for Beginners?
    • Coral Announces Partnership With Birmingham City FC
    • MGM Resorts and BetMGM Expand Responsible Gambling Initiatives
    • Ex-F1 Driver Says McLaren Need to Make Lando Norris Their Number 1 Driver
    • Bet365’s Integration With Evolution’s Live Dealer Games Hailed as ‘Monumental Achievement’
    • Exclusive: Tottenham Interested in Signing Curtis Jones If Richard Rios Transfer Falls Through
    • Lewis Hamilton Has 14% Chance of Winning 2025 Drivers’ Title With Ferrari
    • KPMG Vows Cooperation As It Faces Scrutiny Over 2022 Audit of Entain
    My Betting EdgeMy Betting Edge
    BeGambleAware.org
    Tuesday, April 29
    • Latest News
    • Casinos
    • Sports Betting
    • Slots
    • Casino Reviews
    • Sportsbook Reviews
    My Betting EdgeMy Betting Edge
    Home » US Supreme Court Denies Review of Florida Sports Betting Case, Allowing Digital Betting to Continue

    US Supreme Court Denies Review of Florida Sports Betting Case, Allowing Digital Betting to Continue

    Staff WriterJuly 28, 2024 Casinos
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    On Monday (17 June) morning, the US Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari in the Florida sports betting case filed by West Flagler and Associates (WFA).

    This decision allows digital sports betting to remain active in Florida. WFA might still pursue the case through the Florida state court system.

    In March, the Florida Supreme Court declined to hear WFA’s quo warranto bid, deeming it the wrong “vehicle” for the case, but left the option to re-file in a lower court.

    Initially filed in federal court in late 2021, WFA has now exhausted all federal avenues.

    “The Seminole tribe of Florida applauds today’s decision by the US Supreme Court to decline consideration of the case involving the tribe’s gaming compact with the state of Florida,” tribal spokesman Gary Bitner said.

    “It means members of the Seminole tribe and all Floridians can count on a bright future made possible by the compact.”

    Under the compact, the Seminoles must pay Florida $2.5 billion annually for the first five years of the 30-year agreement.

    This decision validates a compact supporting a hub-and-spoke wagering model, potentially influencing other tribes.

    WFA contends the compact stretches the bounds of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) by allowing off-reservation bets.

    “This may close one door, but still leaves open several that are already open and a host of others that could open,” gambling consultant Brendan Bussmann of BGlobal told iGB.

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh was in favor of hearing the case.

    Previously, Kavanaugh wrote that if the compact allowed off-reservation gaming, it would likely violate the IGRA, as explained by the District Court.

    WFA sought SCOTUS answers on whether IGRA permits the compact, whether it violates the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, and if US Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland violated equal protection principles by approving the compact.

    WFA claims Haaland’s approval gave the Seminoles a monopoly, causing competitive injury to others.

    The Seminoles relaunched their Hard Rock Bet platform in November 2023, following a court mandate to shut it down in 2021.

    The appellate court overturned the lower court’s ruling in June 2023, but Kavanaugh’s opinion opened the door for WFA to file with SCOTUS and the Florida Supreme Court.

    Different issues are in question at the state level, including whether Governor Ron DeSantis and the legislature abused their power and whether the state violated Amendment 3, which requires voter approval for gaming expansion.

    The 2021 compact almost prohibits commercial operators from doing business in Florida without partnering with the Seminoles, requiring them to pay 60% of their revenue to the tribe, a higher rate than any other state.

    “Today’s decision does not prevent Florida’s card rooms from pursuing their challenge that the compact violates Florida’s Proposition 3,” tribal attorney Scott Crowell told iGB.

    He added that an adverse judgment could be resolved by a state-wide election on a compact that benefits Florida’s treasury.

    Keep Reading

    Blackjack vs. Poker: Which One Has Better Odds and Is Better for Beginners?

    Coral Announces Partnership With Birmingham City FC

    MGM Resorts and BetMGM Expand Responsible Gambling Initiatives

    Ex-F1 Driver Says McLaren Need to Make Lando Norris Their Number 1 Driver

    Bet365’s Integration With Evolution’s Live Dealer Games Hailed as ‘Monumental Achievement’

    Exclusive: Tottenham Interested in Signing Curtis Jones If Richard Rios Transfer Falls Through

    Our Partners
    © 2025 MyBettingEdge.org
    • Privacy Policy
    • Be Gamble Aware
    • Advertise
    • Write for Us
    • Contact Us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.